> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.justly.one/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Dispute Types

> Justly supports multiple types of human judgment, depending on the nature of the conflict or evaluation being performed.

Justly supports multiple types of human judgment, depending on the nature of the conflict or evaluation being performed.

Each dispute type defines:

* how participants interact,
* how jurors evaluate information,
* and how outcomes are enforced on-chain.

Not all dispute types are available in the current implementation.\
This section describes the live dispute type and the additional dispute types planned for later versions.

| Types               | Purpose                                 | Outcome            | Status        |
| ------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------- |
| Adversarial Dispute | *Resolve conflicts between two parties* | *Winner/Loser*     | Live          |
| Decision Dispute    | *Validate proposals or decisions*       | *Accept/Reject*    | Later version |
| Rating Evaluation   | *Evaluate quality or contribution*      | *Aggregated Score* | Later version |

### Adversarial Dispute

**Status:** Live (Current Implementation)

Resolves conflicts between two opposing parties: a **Claimer** and a **Defender**.

Jurors evaluate evidence submitted by both sides and vote on a binding outcome that is enforced on-chain.

Used for:

* marketplaces,
* freelancer and contractor platforms,
* fintech and payment disputes,
* peer-to-peer conflicts.

→ *See: Adversarial Dispute*

***

### Decision Dispute

**Status:** Later version

Designed for collective decision-making rather than conflict resolution.

Jurors evaluate whether a proposal or action should be accepted or rejected according to predefined rules.

Used for:

* governance processes,
* protocol-level decisions,
* structured human validation.

→ *See: Decision Dispute*

***

### Rating Evaluation

**Status:** Later version

A collective evaluation mechanism based on structured numerical input rather than binary outcomes.

Jurors provide ratings that are aggregated to measure quality, performance, or contribution.

Used for:

* open-source contribution evaluation,
* content moderation,
* quality and performance scoring,
* reputation systems.

→ *See: Rating Evaluation*

<Note>
  Some dispute types may support additional evaluation rounds under stricter conditions.
</Note>

***

### Extensibility

Justly is designed as a modular protocol.

Additional dispute types and variations can be introduced over time without changing the core execution or incentive model.