- how many jurors are targeted,
- how much jurors stake,
- and the arbitration fee amounts required for each side of the dispute.
- resolution speed,
- required level of trust,
- and the economic risk assumed by the parties and jurors.
What changes between tiers
1. Number of jurors
Each tier defines how many human jurors are targeted for a dispute.- Lower tiers use fewer jurors, enabling faster and lower-cost resolutions.
- Higher tiers use more jurors, increasing diversity of judgment and reducing the likelihood of biased outcomes.
2. Stakes and fees
Tiers establish the economic values for:- juror stakes,
- the claimer-side funding requirement,
- and the defender-side funding requirement.
- increase the cost of malicious behavior,
- raise the economic commitment of participants,
- and better align incentives when the value or complexity of the dispute is higher.
3. Security level
The security level of a dispute increases as the tier becomes higher. This is driven by the combination of:- a larger number of jurors,
- higher economic stakes,
- and a greater total cost required to manipulate the outcome.
- higher-value disputes,
- more complex cases,
- or situations where an additional level of confidence is required.
Tier system design
Tiers do not exist to segment users, but to offer security options proportional to the risk of a given conflict. For integrators, tiers are the main abstraction exposed through the SDK or API.- tiers are fixed and predefined by the protocol,
- all disputes within the same tier follow exactly the same rules,
- and outcomes are executed automatically and verifiably on-chain.