- resolution speed,
- required level of trust,
- and the economic risk assumed by both parties and jurors.
What Changes Between Tiers
1. Number of Jurors
Each tier defines how many human jurors participate in resolving a dispute.- Lower tiers use fewer jurors, enabling faster and lower-cost resolutions.
- Higher tiers use more jurors, increasing diversity of judgment and reducing the likelihood of biased outcomes.
2. Stakes
Tiers establish the required stake amounts for both:- the parties involved in the dispute (claimer and defender),
- and the jurors participating in the vote.
- increase the cost of malicious behavior,
- raise the economic commitment of participants,
- and better align incentives when the value or complexity of the dispute is higher.
3. Security Level
The security level of a dispute increases as the tier becomes higher. This is driven by the combination of:- a larger number of jurors,
- higher economic stakes,
- and a greater total cost required to manipulate the outcome.
- higher-value disputes,
- more complex cases,
- or situations where an additional level of confidence is required.
Tier System Design
Tiers do not exist to segment users, but to offer security options proportional to the risk of a given conflict. In the current implementation:- tiers are fixed and predefined by the protocol,
- all disputes within the same tier follow exactly the same rules,
- and outcomes are executed automatically and verifiably on-chain.